Source: http://www.vostrisoldi.it/articolo/win-for-life-ecco-le-probabilita-di-vincita/ 19035 /
Even the game "Win for Life", as well as Superenalotto and the "old" football pools, pay premiums significantly lower than the average number of combinations that need to be able to play to win. For example, how many combinations must play at least be able to make statistical "7", winning the lowest premium?
Well, first of all, to have the mathematical certainty of winning the income of 4,000 euro per month for 20 years, should a player plays the beauty of 3,695,120 combinations, and considering that a combination costs a euro, it is clear that the first prize of " Win for Life" is difficult to win.
To this end, in fact, Riccardo Bersani , requested by the student of logic Salvagente.it , puts it out as a hit ten balls and the "Numeron" is less difficult than a "6" to Superenalotto , but three times harder than a "5" also made the Lotto .
Overall, the probability of winning the game , playing a euro, an average of one every eleven play combinations, but this, as highlights Riccardo Bersani means that 91% of the game is "loser." The same is true of playing two euro: the probability of winning is one in six, which means that on average more than 80% of played is a loser. Also "Win for Life," and, like all games, a few awards but lose many, reason why it is right to play for the fun of it , but not with the fixed idea of \u200b\u200bpursuing at all costs the "annuity".
Image taken from: www.voceditalia.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment